netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] 9p/xen : Fix use after free bug in xen_9pfs_front

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJedcCwXhrkfVOHz-+N=qZxP465JJ0wSJG37ppOAFNfDt0ABqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 09:07:02 +0800
From:   Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>, ericvh@...il.com,
        lucho@...kov.net, asmadeus@...ewreck.org, linux_oss@...debyte.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 1395428693sheep@...il.com,
        alex000young@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] 9p/xen : Fix use after free bug in
 xen_9pfs_front_remove due to race condition

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> 于2023年3月14日周二 05:30写道：
>
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 14:54:20 +0100 Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > > @@ -274,12 +274,17 @@ static const struct xenbus_device_id xen_9pfs_front_ids[] = {
> > >  static void xen_9pfs_front_free(struct xen_9pfs_front_priv *priv)
> > >  {
> > >     int i, j;
> > > +   struct xen_9pfs_dataring *ring = NULL;
> > Move it before int i, j to have RCT.
> >
> > >
> > >     write_lock(&xen_9pfs_lock);
> > >     list_del(&priv->list);
> > >     write_unlock(&xen_9pfs_lock);
> > >
> > >     for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rings; i++) {
> > > +           /*cancel work*/
> > It isn't needed I think, the function cancel_work_sync() tells everything
> > here.
>
> Note that 9p is more storage than networking, so this patch is likely
> to go via a different tree than us.

Sorry I got confused.

Best regards,
Zheng