netdev - [net 05/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, Fix wrong usage of source port rewrite in split rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230314174940.62221-6-saeed@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:49:31 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Subject: [net 05/14] net/mlx5: E-switch, Fix wrong usage of source port rewrite in split rules

From: Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>

In few cases, rules with mirror use case are split to two FTEs, one which
do the mirror action and forward to second FTE which do the rest of the rule
actions and the second redirect action.
In case of mirror rules which do split and forward to ovs internal port or
VF stack devices, source port rewrite should be used in the second FTE but
it is wrongly also set in the first FTE which break the offload.

Fix this issue by removing the wrong check if source port rewrite is needed to
be used on the first FTE of the split and instead return EOPNOTSUPP which will
block offload of rules which mirror to ovs internal port or VF stack devices
which isn't supported.

Fixes: 10742efc20a4 ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel TX traffic offloading")
Fixes: a508728a4c8b ("net/mlx5e: VF tunnel RX traffic offloading")
Signed-off-by: Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
index d766a64b1823..22075943bb58 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
@@ -723,11 +723,11 @@ mlx5_eswitch_add_fwd_rule(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 
 	flow_act.action = MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST;
 	for (i = 0; i < esw_attr->split_count; i++) {
-		if (esw_is_indir_table(esw, attr))
-			err = esw_setup_indir_table(dest, &flow_act, esw, attr, false, &i);
-		else if (esw_is_chain_src_port_rewrite(esw, esw_attr))
-			err = esw_setup_chain_src_port_rewrite(dest, &flow_act, esw, chains, attr,
-							       &i);
+		if (esw_attr->dests[i].flags & MLX5_ESW_DEST_CHAIN_WITH_SRC_PORT_CHANGE)
+			/* Source port rewrite (forward to ovs internal port or statck device) isn't
+			 * supported in the rule of split action.
+			 */
+			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		else
 			esw_setup_vport_dest(dest, &flow_act, esw, esw_attr, i, i, false);
 
-- 
2.39.2