netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 net 1/2] tcp: Fix bind() conflict check for dual-stack wildcard address.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:05:29 +0100
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Holzinger <pholzing@...hat.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 1/2] tcp: Fix bind() conflict check for dual-stack
 wildcard address.

On 15.03.23 08:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:42:48 +0100 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) wrote:
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAG_fn=Ud3zSW7AZWXc+asfMhZVL5ETnvuY44Pmyv4NPv-ijN-A@mail.gmail.com/
>> [1]
>> Fixes: 5456262d2baa ("net: Fix incorrect address comparison when
>> searching for a bind2 bucket")
>> Reported-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@...hat.com>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e21bf153-80b0-9ec0-15ba-e04a4ad42c34@redhat.com/
>> [0]
> 
> I tried to fix this manually when applying but:
>  - your email client wraps your replies
>  - please don't reply to patches with tags which will look to scripts
>    and patchwork like tags it should pull into the submission
>    (Reported-by in particular, here)

Sorry for the mixup and thx for letting me know, will simply quote my
suggestion next time, that should avoid both problems.

Ciao, Thorsten