[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBGDNlelN0WFBaq6@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 09:35:02 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@...dozajonas.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:14:37PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 5:50 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:47:16AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> > > of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> > > of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> > > Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
> > > index a502812ac418..86f7843b4591 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
> > > @@ -2709,8 +2709,7 @@ static int velocity_get_platform_info(struct velocity_info *vptr)
> > > struct resource res;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > - if (of_get_property(vptr->dev->of_node, "no-eeprom", NULL))
> > > - vptr->no_eeprom = 1;
> > > + vptr->no_eeprom = of_property_read_bool(vptr->dev->of_node, "no-eeprom");
> >
> > As per my comment on "[PATCH] nfc: mrvl: Use of_property_read_bool() for
> > boolean properties".
> >
> > I'm not that enthusiastic about assigning a bool value to a field
> > with an integer type. But that is likely a topic for another patch.
> >
> > > ret = of_address_to_resource(vptr->dev->of_node, 0, &res);
> > > if (ret) {
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
> > > index 1c53b5546927..47c2ad7a3e42 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
> > > @@ -1177,14 +1177,9 @@ static int ucc_hdlc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > uhdlc_priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > uhdlc_priv->ut_info = ut_info;
> > >
> > > - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,tdm-interface", NULL))
> > > - uhdlc_priv->tsa = 1;
> > > -
> > > - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,ucc-internal-loopback", NULL))
> > > - uhdlc_priv->loopback = 1;
> > > -
> > > - if (of_get_property(np, "fsl,hdlc-bus", NULL))
> > > - uhdlc_priv->hdlc_bus = 1;
> > > + uhdlc_priv->tsa = of_property_read_bool(np, "fsl,tdm-interface");
> >
> > Here too.
>
> These are already bool.
Sorry, I thought I checked. But clearly I messed it up somehow.
> Turns out the only one that needs changing is
> no_eeprom. netdev folks marked this as changes requested, so I'll add
> that in v2.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists