netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v1 1/2] ice: fix W=1 headers mismatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <356f0d97-84ae-d508-93d2-a3a68187e03e@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 10:55:26 +0100
From:   Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To:     Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC:     <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v1 1/2] ice: fix W=1 headers
 mismatch

From: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 13:29:41 -0700

> On 3/14/2023 6:54 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> From: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>

[...]

> Quoting myself:
>> Fix a couple of small issues, with a small refactor to correctly handle
>> a possible misconfiguration of RDMA filters, and some trivial function
>> headers that didn't match their function.
> 
> Please see the last half of the sentence, regarding fixing these trivial
> comment-only issues. If you still think that isn't enough I can reword
> or resend, but in this case I don't think there is anything wrong, do
> you agree after my explanation? Did I miss something?

I've read the cover letter, but its subject is "ice_switch fixes
series", that's why I wrote this :D That confuses a bit. I've no
problems with this spin, Tony doesn't preserve cover letter subjects anyway.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jesse
> 

Thanks,
Olek