[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f0cb0a4-5611-4c61-9165-30cf1b1ef543@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:30:36 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: realtek: fix out-of-bounds access
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 02:09:15PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> The probe function sets priv->chip_data to (void *)priv + sizeof(*priv)
> with the expectation that priv has enough trailing space.
>
> However, only realtek-smi actually allocated this chip_data space.
> Do likewise in realtek-mdio to fix out-of-bounds accesses.
Hi Ahmad
It is normal to include a patch 0/X which gives the big picture, what
does this patch set do as a whole.
Please try to remember this for the next set you post.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists