[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230315163846.3114-4-klaus.kudielka@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:38:45 +0100
From: Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: move call to mv88e6xxx_mdios_register()
Call the rather expensive mv88e6xxx_mdios_register() at the beginning of
mv88e6xxx_setup(). This avoids the double call via mv88e6xxx_probe()
during boot.
For symmetry, call mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister() at the end of
mv88e6xxx_teardown().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/449bde236c08d5ab5e54abd73b645d8b29955894.camel@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Signed-off-by: Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
---
Notes:
v2: Extend the cleanup in mv88e6xxx_setup() to remove the mdio bus on failure
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 496015baac..29b0f3bb1c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -3840,9 +3840,9 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
}
}
-static int mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
- struct device_node *np)
+static int mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
{
+ struct device_node *np = chip->dev->of_node;
struct device_node *child;
int err;
@@ -3877,9 +3877,12 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
static void mv88e6xxx_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
+ struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
+
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_params(ds);
dsa_devlink_resources_unregister(ds);
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_regions_global(ds);
+ mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
}
static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
@@ -3889,6 +3892,10 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
int err;
int i;
+ err = mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(chip);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
chip->ds = ds;
ds->slave_mii_bus = mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus(chip);
@@ -4015,7 +4022,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out_mdios;
/* Have to be called without holding the register lock, since
* they take the devlink lock, and we later take the locks in
@@ -4024,7 +4031,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
*/
err = mv88e6xxx_setup_devlink_resources(ds);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out_mdios;
err = mv88e6xxx_setup_devlink_params(ds);
if (err)
@@ -4040,6 +4047,8 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
mv88e6xxx_teardown_devlink_params(ds);
out_resources:
dsa_devlink_resources_unregister(ds);
+out_mdios:
+ mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
return err;
}
@@ -7220,18 +7229,12 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
if (err)
goto out_g1_atu_prob_irq;
- err = mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(chip, np);
- if (err)
- goto out_g1_vtu_prob_irq;
-
err = mv88e6xxx_register_switch(chip);
if (err)
- goto out_mdio;
+ goto out_g1_vtu_prob_irq;
return 0;
-out_mdio:
- mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
out_g1_vtu_prob_irq:
mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free(chip);
out_g1_atu_prob_irq:
@@ -7268,7 +7271,6 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
mv88e6xxx_phy_destroy(chip);
mv88e6xxx_unregister_switch(chip);
- mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free(chip);
mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_free(chip);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists