netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: fec: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230315062939.a6co333ssuz564p2@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2023 07:29:39 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: fec: Convert to platform remove
 callback returning void

Hello Jakub,

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:28:21PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 23:15:08 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > FTR: This patch depends on patch 2 of this series which has issues. So
> > please drop this patch, too. Taking the other 7 patches should be fine
> > (unless some more issues are discovered of course).
> 
> Could you post a v2 with just the right patches in it?
> Would be quicker for us to handle and we're drowning in patches ATM :(

That approximately matches my plan. I didn't intend to resend the
patches that were not criticised if you pick them up. I have still 2000+
patches of this type in my queue and intend to care for the rejects when
I'm through sending them all once. When I rebase then I can easily see
which drivers need some more care. I expect that won't happen in the
current development cycle.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)