[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c716e535-7426-56da-ca6f-51c7d7d69bb3@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 09:20:03 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac
On 16/03/2023 09:15, Guo Samin wrote:
>>>> interrupts: ???
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> snps,dwmac.yaml has defined the reg/interrupt/interrupt-names nodes,
>>> and the JH7110 SoC is also applicable.
>>> Maybe just add reg/interrupt/interrupt-names to the required ?
>>
>> You need to constrain them.
>
>
> I see. I will add reg constraints in the next version, thanks.
>
> I have one more question, the interrupts/interrup-names of JH7110 SoC's gmac are exactly the same as snps,dwmac.yaml,
> do these also need to be constrained?
The interrupts on common binding are variable, so you need to constrain
them - you have fixed number of them, right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists