netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] can: m_can: Add rx coalescing ethtool support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 11:05:24 +0100
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
Cc:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/16] can: m_can: Add rx coalescing ethtool support

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:05:39PM +0100, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> Add the possibility to set coalescing parameters with ethtool.
> 
> rx-frames-irq and rx-usecs-irq can only be set and unset together as the
> implemented mechanism would not work otherwise. rx-frames-irq can't be
> greater than the RX FIFO size.
> 
> Also all values can only be changed if the chip is not active.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>

Nit below not withstanding,

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> index 94c962ac6992..7f8decfae81e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c

...

> +static int m_can_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> +			      struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
> +			      struct kernel_ethtool_coalesce *kec,
> +			      struct netlink_ext_ack *ext_ack)
> +{
> +	struct m_can_classdev *cdev = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	if (cdev->can.state != CAN_STATE_STOPPED) {
> +		netdev_err(dev, "Device is in use, please shut it down first\n");
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq > cdev->mcfg[MRAM_RXF0].num) {
> +		netdev_err(dev, "rx-frames-irq %u greater than the RX FIFO %u\n",
> +			   ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq,
> +			   cdev->mcfg[MRAM_RXF0].num);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	if ((ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq == 0) != (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq == 0)) {

nit: checkpatch complains about unnecessary parentheses on the line above.

drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:1970: CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq == 0'
+	if ((ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq == 0) != (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq == 0)) {

drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:1970: CHECK: Unnecessary parentheses around 'ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq == 0'
+	if ((ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq == 0) != (ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq == 0)) {

> +		netdev_err(dev, "rx-frames-irq and rx-usecs-irq can only be set together\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	cdev->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq = ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq;
> +	cdev->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq = ec->rx_coalesce_usecs_irq;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

...