[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1409f34-86b5-14e8-f352-5032aa57ca46@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:35:04 +0530
From: Md Danish Anwar <a0501179@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<srk@...com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] soc: ti: pruss: Add helper
functions to set GPI mode, MII_RT_event and XFR
Hi Roger,
On 15/03/23 17:52, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>
> On 13/03/2023 13:11, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>>
>> The PRUSS CFG module is represented as a syscon node and is currently
>> managed by the PRUSS platform driver. Add easy accessor functions to set
>> GPI mode, MII_RT event enable/disable and XFR (XIN XOUT) enable/disable
>> to enable the PRUSS Ethernet usecase. These functions reuse the generic
>> pruss_cfg_update() API function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>> Co-developed-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <p-mohan@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/remoteproc/pruss.h | 22 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>> index 26d8129b515c..2f04b7922ddb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
>> @@ -203,6 +203,66 @@ static int pruss_cfg_update(struct pruss *pruss, unsigned int reg,
>> return regmap_update_bits(pruss->cfg_regmap, reg, mask, val);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * pruss_cfg_gpimode() - set the GPI mode of the PRU
>> + * @pruss: the pruss instance handle
>> + * @pru_id: id of the PRU core within the PRUSS
>> + * @mode: GPI mode to set
>> + *
>> + * Sets the GPI mode for a given PRU by programming the
>> + * corresponding PRUSS_CFG_GPCFGx register
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
>> + */
>> +int pruss_cfg_gpimode(struct pruss *pruss, enum pruss_pru_id pru_id,
>> + enum pruss_gpi_mode mode)
>> +{
>> + if (pru_id < 0 || pru_id >= PRUSS_NUM_PRUS)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + if (mode < 0 || mode > PRUSS_GPI_MODE_MAX)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return pruss_cfg_update(pruss, PRUSS_CFG_GPCFG(pru_id),
>> + PRUSS_GPCFG_PRU_GPI_MODE_MASK,
>> + mode << PRUSS_GPCFG_PRU_GPI_MODE_SHIFT);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pruss_cfg_gpimode);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * pruss_cfg_miirt_enable() - Enable/disable MII RT Events
>> + * @pruss: the pruss instance
>> + * @enable: enable/disable
>> + *
>> + * Enable/disable the MII RT Events for the PRUSS.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
>> + */
>> +int pruss_cfg_miirt_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + u32 set = enable ? PRUSS_MII_RT_EVENT_EN : 0;
>> +
>> + return pruss_cfg_update(pruss, PRUSS_CFG_MII_RT,
>> + PRUSS_MII_RT_EVENT_EN, set);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pruss_cfg_miirt_enable);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * pruss_cfg_xfr_enable() - Enable/disable XIN XOUT shift functionality
>> + * @pruss: the pruss instance
>> + * @enable: enable/disable
>> + * @mask: Mask for PRU / RTU
>
> You should not expect the user to provide the mask but only
> the core type e.g.
>
> enum pru_type {
> PRU_TYPE_PRU = 0,
> PRU_TYPE_RTU,
> PRU_TYPE_TX_PRU,
> PRU_TYPE_MAX,
> };
>
> Then you figure out the mask in the function.
> Also check for invalid pru_type and return error if so.
>
Sure Roger, I will create a enum and take it as parameter in API. Based on
these enum I will calculate mask and do XFR shifting inside the API
pruss_cfg_xfr_enable().
There are two registers for XFR shift.
#define PRUSS_SPP_XFER_SHIFT_EN BIT(1)
#define PRUSS_SPP_RTU_XFR_SHIFT_EN BIT(3)
For PRU XFR shifting, the mask should be PRUSS_SPP_XFER_SHIFT_EN,
for RTU shifting mask should be PRUSS_SPP_RTU_XFR_SHIFT_EN and for PRU and RTU
shifting mask should be (PRUSS_SPP_XFER_SHIFT_EN | PRUSS_SPP_RTU_XFR_SHIFT_EN)
So the enum would be something like this.
/**
* enum xfr_shift_type - XFR shift type
* @XFR_SHIFT_PRU: Enables XFR shift for PRU
* @XFR_SHIFT_RTU: Enables XFR shift for RTU
* @XFR_SHIFT_PRU_RTU: Enables XFR shift for both PRU and RTU
* @XFR_SHIFT_MAX: Total number of XFR shift types available.
*
*/
enum xfr_shift_type {
XFR_SHIFT_PRU = 0,
XFR_SHIFT_RTU,
XFR_SHIFT_PRU_RTU,
XFR_SHIFT_MAX,
};
In pruss_cfg_xfr_enable() API, I will use switch case, and for first three
enums, I will calculate the mask.
If input is anything other than first three, I will retun -EINVAL. This will
serve as check for valid xfr_shift_type.
The API will look like this.
int pruss_cfg_xfr_enable(struct pruss *pruss, enum xfr_shift_type xfr_type,
bool enable);
{
u32 mask;
switch (xfr_type) {
case XFR_SHIFT_PRU:
mask = PRUSS_SPP_XFER_SHIFT_EN;
break;
case XFR_SHIFT_RTU:
mask = PRUSS_SPP_RTU_XFR_SHIFT_EN;
break;
case XFR_SHIFT_PRU_RTU:
mask = PRUSS_SPP_XFER_SHIFT_EN | PRUSS_SPP_RTU_XFR_SHIFT_EN;
break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
u32 set = enable ? mask : 0;
return pruss_cfg_update(pruss, PRUSS_CFG_SPP, mask, set);
}
This entire change I will keep as part of this patch only.
Please let me know if this looks OK to you.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 on success, or an error code otherwise
>> + */
>> +int pruss_cfg_xfr_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable, u32 mask)
>
> re-arrange so it is (struct pruss, enum pru_type, bool enable)
>
>> +{
>> + u32 set = enable ? mask : 0;
>> +
>> + return pruss_cfg_update(pruss, PRUSS_CFG_SPP, mask, set);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pruss_cfg_xfr_enable);
>> +
>> static void pruss_of_free_clk_provider(void *data)
>> {
>> struct device_node *clk_mux_np = data;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc/pruss.h b/include/linux/remoteproc/pruss.h
>> index 12ef10b9fe9a..51a3eedd2be6 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc/pruss.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc/pruss.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ enum pruss_gpi_mode {
>> PRUSS_GPI_MODE_PARALLEL,
>> PRUSS_GPI_MODE_28BIT_SHIFT,
>> PRUSS_GPI_MODE_MII,
>> + PRUSS_GPI_MODE_MAX,
>
> This could have come as part of patch 3.
>
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -165,6 +166,10 @@ int pruss_request_mem_region(struct pruss *pruss, enum pruss_mem mem_id,
>> struct pruss_mem_region *region);
>> int pruss_release_mem_region(struct pruss *pruss,
>> struct pruss_mem_region *region);
>> +int pruss_cfg_gpimode(struct pruss *pruss, enum pruss_pru_id pru_id,
>> + enum pruss_gpi_mode mode);
>> +int pruss_cfg_miirt_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable);
>> +int pruss_cfg_xfr_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable, u32 mask);
>>
>> #else
>>
>> @@ -188,6 +193,23 @@ static inline int pruss_release_mem_region(struct pruss *pruss,
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int pruss_cfg_gpimode(struct pruss *pruss,
>> + enum pruss_pru_id pru_id,
>> + enum pruss_gpi_mode mode)
>> +{
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int pruss_cfg_miirt_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int pruss_cfg_xfr_enable(struct pruss *pruss, bool enable, u32 mask)
>> +{
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif /* CONFIG_TI_PRUSS */
>>
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PRU_REMOTEPROC)
>
> cheers,
> -roger
--
Thanks and Regards,
Danish.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists