lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64134bb72b142_337f512085f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:02:47 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] net/packet: annotate accesses to po->xmit

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:20 AM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > We could avoid the indirect function call with a branch on
> > packet_use_direct_xmit() and just store a bit?
> >
> 
> 
> Sure, I can add this in a separate patch, unless you want to implement
> this idea.

Either way. Great if you want to send it after this series is merged.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ