[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64134bb72b142_337f512085f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:02:47 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] net/packet: annotate accesses to po->xmit
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 8:20 AM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > We could avoid the indirect function call with a branch on
> > packet_use_direct_xmit() and just store a bit?
> >
>
>
> Sure, I can add this in a separate patch, unless you want to implement
> this idea.
Either way. Great if you want to send it after this series is merged.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists