[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FC80D64-DACB-4223-A345-BCE71125C342@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 05:21:42 +0000
From: Ronak Doshi <doshir@...are.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Pv-drivers <Pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Guolin Yang <gyang@...are.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vmxnet3: use gro callback when UPT is enabled
> On 3/15/23, 9:13 PM, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org <mailto:kuba@...nel.org>> wrote:
>
> Can you provide some numbers to illustrate what the slow down is?
Below are some sample test numbers collected by our perf team.
Test socket & msg size base using only gro
1VM 14vcpu UDP stream receive 256K 256 bytes (packets/sec) 217.01 Kps 187.98 Kps -13.37%
16VM 2vcpu TCP stream send Thpt 8K 256 bytes (Gbps) 18.00 Gbps 17.02 Gbps -5.44%
1VM 14vcpu ResponseTimeMean Receive (in micro secs) 163 us 170 us -4.29%
In the past as well similar test was done. See
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/1308947605-4300-1-git-send-email-jesse@nicira.com/
But, unfortunately there are no stats present in that discussion.
Thanks,
Ronak
Powered by blists - more mailing lists