[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wijs3BOOnJ9chfhR9DEQ0LNL0krPfhi=d9_mUwSBhog1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 17:34:20 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] inet: preserve const qualifier in inet_sk()
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 5:23 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Oh I might have been fooled, because of course we can not use sk for
> the macro parameter name.
Heh. Yeah, that will rename the 'sk' member name too, and cause some
*very* strange errors.
> Basically something like this should work just fine
Yup.
I'm testing it on the current git tree, and I'm finding a number of
random issues, but it looks manageable. Attached is what I ended up
with.
You have presumably already fixed these issues in your tree.
Btw, it's very much things like 'tcp_sk()' too, and doing that with
#define tcp_sk(ptr) container_of_const(ptr, struct tcp_sock,
inet_conn.icsk_inet.sk)
actually shows some fundamental problems. For example, we have
tcp_synq_overflow() that takes a const sk pointer, but then it does
WRITE_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp, now);
which is a big no-no and writes to that sock thing.
I didn't even try any of the other 'xyzzy_sk()' conversions.
Linus
View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (4133 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists