[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f7be52d197fee7f643217341b057185b7e9f9d1.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:59:42 +0100
From: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: pcs: xpcs: remove double-read of link
state when using AN
Hi Russell,
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:12 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:44:48AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 14:46 +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > > content is safe
> > >
> > > Phylink does not want the current state of the link when reading the
> > > PCS link state - it wants the latched state. Don't double-read the
> > > MII status register. Phylink will re-read as necessary to capture
> > > transient link-down events as of dbae3388ea9c ("net: phylink: Force
> > > retrigger in case of latched link-fail indicator").
> > >
> > > The above referenced commit is a dependency for this change, and thus
> > > this change should not be backported to any kernel that does not
> > > contain the above referenced commit.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fcb26bd2b6ca ("net: phy: Add Synopsys DesignWare XPCS MDIO module")
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 13 ++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > index bc428a816719..04a685353041 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > > @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int xpcs_read_fault_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, bool an)
> > > +static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
> > > {
> > > bool link = true;
> > > int ret;
> > > @@ -333,15 +333,6 @@ static int xpcs_read_link_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > bool an)
> > > if (!(ret & MDIO_STAT1_LSTATUS))
> > > link = false;
> > >
> > > - if (an) {
> > > - ret = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_AN, MDIO_STAT1);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > - return ret;
> > > -
> > > - if (!(ret & MDIO_STAT1_LSTATUS))
> > > - link = false;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > return link;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -935,7 +926,7 @@ static int xpcs_get_state_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > /* Link needs to be read first ... */
> > > - state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs, state->an_enabled) > 0 ? 1
> > > : 0;
> > > + state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs) > 0 ? 1 : 0;
> >
> > Couldn't you just say:
> >
> > state->link = xpcs_read_link_c73(xpcs) > 0;
> >
> > That should be a boolean, right?
>
> That would be another change to the code - and consider how such a
> change would fit in this series given its description and also this
> patch.
>
> IMHO such a change should be a separate patch - and there's plenty
> of scope for cleanups like the one you suggest in this driver.
>
> Thanks.
OK - got that!
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>
BR
Steen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists