lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230317091336.vzxquodjybgo4nhv@wittgenstein>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:13:36 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc:     aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com, arnd@...db.de,
        davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, kuba@...nel.org, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] scm: add SO_PASSPIDFD and SCM_PIDFD

On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 10:53:20PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From:   Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:15:24 +0100
> > Implement SCM_PIDFD, a new type of CMSG type analogical to SCM_CREDENTIALS,
> > but it contains pidfd instead of plain pid, which allows programmers not
> > to care about PID reuse problem.
> > 
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h    |  2 ++
> >  arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h     |  2 ++
> >  arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h   |  2 ++
> >  arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h    |  2 ++
> >  include/linux/net.h                     |  1 +
> >  include/linux/socket.h                  |  1 +
> >  include/net/scm.h                       | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> >  include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h       |  2 ++
> >  net/core/sock.c                         | 11 +++++++++++
> >  net/mptcp/sockopt.c                     |  1 +
> >  net/unix/af_unix.c                      | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> >  tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h |  2 ++
> >  12 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > index 739891b94136..ff310613ae64 100644
> > --- a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > +++ b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define SO_RCVMARK		75
> >  
> > +#define SO_PASSPIDFD		76
> > +
> >  #if !defined(__KERNEL__)
> >  
> >  #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > index 18f3d95ecfec..762dcb80e4ec 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > +++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define SO_RCVMARK		75
> >  
> > +#define SO_PASSPIDFD		76
> > +
> >  #if !defined(__KERNEL__)
> >  
> >  #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > index f486d3dfb6bb..df16a3e16d64 100644
> > --- a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > +++ b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > @@ -129,6 +129,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define SO_RCVMARK		0x4049
> >  
> > +#define SO_PASSPIDFD		0x404A
> > +
> >  #if !defined(__KERNEL__)
> >  
> >  #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > index 2fda57a3ea86..6e2847804fea 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> > @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define SO_RCVMARK               0x0054
> >  
> > +#define SO_PASSPIDFD             0x0055
> > +
> >  #if !defined(__KERNEL__)
> >  
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> > index b73ad8e3c212..c234dfbe7a30 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct net;
> >  #define SOCK_PASSSEC		4
> >  #define SOCK_SUPPORT_ZC		5
> >  #define SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT	6
> > +#define SOCK_PASSPIDFD		7
> >  
> >  #ifndef ARCH_HAS_SOCKET_TYPES
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h
> > index 13c3a237b9c9..6bf90f251910 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/socket.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/socket.h
> > @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static inline size_t msg_data_left(struct msghdr *msg)
> >  #define	SCM_RIGHTS	0x01		/* rw: access rights (array of int) */
> >  #define SCM_CREDENTIALS 0x02		/* rw: struct ucred		*/
> >  #define SCM_SECURITY	0x03		/* rw: security label		*/
> > +#define SCM_PIDFD	0x04		/* ro: pidfd (int)		*/
> >  
> >  struct ucred {
> >  	__u32	pid;
> > diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
> > index 585adc1346bd..4617fbc65294 100644
> > --- a/include/net/scm.h
> > +++ b/include/net/scm.h
> > @@ -124,7 +124,9 @@ static __inline__ void scm_recv(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> >  				struct scm_cookie *scm, int flags)
> >  {
> >  	if (!msg->msg_control) {
> > -		if (test_bit(SOCK_PASSCRED, &sock->flags) || scm->fp ||
> > +		if (test_bit(SOCK_PASSCRED, &sock->flags) ||
> > +		    test_bit(SOCK_PASSPIDFD, &sock->flags) ||
> > +		    scm->fp ||
> 
> nit: I'd remove newline here.
> 
> 
> >  		    scm_has_secdata(sock))
> >  			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_CTRUNC;
> >  		scm_destroy(scm);
> > @@ -141,6 +143,18 @@ static __inline__ void scm_recv(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> >  		put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_CREDENTIALS, sizeof(ucreds), &ucreds);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (test_bit(SOCK_PASSPIDFD, &sock->flags)) {
> > +		int pidfd;
> > +
> > +		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!scm->pid) ||
> > +		    !pid_has_task(scm->pid, PIDTYPE_TGID))
> 
> Can we change pidfd_create() to return -ESRCH as it has the same test ?

I don't think we can do this. pidfd_create() can't distinguish between
"this task has been reaped" and "this is a non-thread group leader". So
EINVAL is a better hint especially since pidfd_open() is preceeded by a
check that would return -ESRCH.

It would also be a uapi change for the pidfd_open() syscall to change
pidfd_create() like that and for fanotify as well. Now they get EINVAL
for a non-thread group leader pid they pass into the system call.
Afterwards they'd get ESRCH which is at least misleading if not wrong.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ