netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] vringh: support VA with iotlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230317112536.t7gm4dop5cafgvoe@sgarzare-redhat>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:25:36 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@...tuozzo.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, stefanha@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] vringh: support VA with iotlb

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 5:07 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 3:39 PM Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@...hat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:35 PM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > vDPA supports the possibility to use user VA in the iotlb messages.
>> > > So, let's add support for user VA in vringh to use it in the vDPA
>> > > simulators.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>> > > ---
>> > >
>> > > Notes:
>> > >     v2:
>> > >     - replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page() [see previous patch]
>> > >     - fix cast warnings when build with W=1 C=1
>> > >
>> > >  include/linux/vringh.h            |   5 +-
>> > >  drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c |   2 +-
>> > >  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c  |   4 +-
>> > >  drivers/vhost/vringh.c            | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > >  4 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>> > >
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >
>> > It seems to me iotlb_translate_va and iotlb_translate_pa are very
>> > similar, their only difference is that the argument is that iov is
>> > iovec instead of bio_vec. And how to fill it, obviously.
>> >
>> > It would be great to merge both functions, only differing with a
>> > conditional on vrh->use_va, or generics, or similar. Or, if following
>> > the style of the rest of vringh code, to provide a callback to fill
>> > iovec (although I like conditional more).
>> >
>> > However I cannot think of an easy way to perform that without long
>> > macros or type erasure.
>>
>> Thank you for pushing me :-)
>> I finally managed to avoid code duplication (partial patch attached,
>> but not yet fully tested).
>>
>> @Jason: with this refactoring I removed copy_to_va/copy_to_pa, so I
>> also avoided getu16_iotlb_va/pa.
>>
>> I will send the full patch in v3, but I would like to get your opinion
>> first ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> index 0ba3ef809e48..71dd67700e36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
>> @@ -1096,8 +1096,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_need_notify_kern);
>>
>>  static int iotlb_translate(const struct vringh *vrh,
>>                            u64 addr, u64 len, u64 *translated,
>> -                          struct bio_vec iov[],
>> -                          int iov_size, u32 perm)
>> +                          void *iov, int iov_size, bool iovec, u32 perm)
>
>I think this is an improvement, but we're doing type erasure here. I
>don't think it is a big deal since the function is not exported, it's
>pretty contained in this file, so I'd ack this version too. I'm just
>throwing ideas here:
>
>a) typedef the union {iovec, bio_vec} and use that type in the parameter.
>
>As a drawback, that union feels out of place in this file. Is this the
>only place where it is needed? I don't see other similar uses in the
>kernel.

iov_iter has something similar, but they are const pointers, so IIUC
it is not supposed to be used to set the bvec contents, just iterate it.

Anyway I thought something similar and should be doable, but since
it was internal API I went to type erasure.

>
>b) To convert from iov to bio_iov at return
>The drawback is the extra processing if the compiler is not smart
>enough to inline it. I prefer the previous one but I didn't want to
>omit it, just in case.

Yep, I prefer too the previous one, so let's go in that direction for
v3 ;-)

Thanks,
Stefano