[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b657a2a7-ddf4-d42f-02a9-16f297e9ef07@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 07:12:50 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, elder@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: qcom,ipa: add SDX65 compatible
On 3/16/23 7:10 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:43:05 -0500 Alex Elder wrote:
>> Add support for SDX65, which uses IPA v5.0.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> v2: Add review tag; base on linux-next/master; drop "net-next" in subject
>>
>> It is my intention to have this patch be taken via the Qualcomm
>> repository (not net-next).
>
> That's a bit unusual, no strong feelings but why is that?
> Bindings usually go with the code, ipa is a networking thing, right?
I'm sorry, yes, there is no reason the bindings update
should be taken through the Qualcomm tree.
This is a trivial patch. This version (2) is based on
linux-next/master but it can be cleanly cherry-picked
onto net-next/master.
Please accept this patch via net-next, and if you want
me to send an updated version, please say so.
I'm very sorry for the confusion here. For some reason
this has been a rough week with little patches for me.
-Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists