[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <167909401858.5252.11781424904586437290.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 23:00:18 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...nel.org, void@...ifault.com, davemarchevsky@...a.com,
tj@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Add detection of kfuncs.
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:19:16 -0700 you wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>
> Allow BPF programs detect at load time whether particular kfunc exists.
>
> Patch 1: Allow ld_imm64 to point to kfunc in the kernel.
> Patch 2: Fix relocation of kfunc in ld_imm64 insn when kfunc is in kernel module.
> Patch 3: Introduce bpf_ksym_exists() macro.
> Patch 4: selftest.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,bpf-next,1/4] bpf: Allow ld_imm64 instruction to point to kfunc.
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/58aa2afbb1e6
- [v2,bpf-next,2/4] libbpf: Fix relocation of kfunc ksym in ld_imm64 insn.
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5fc13ad59b60
- [v2,bpf-next,3/4] libbpf: Introduce bpf_ksym_exists() macro.
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5cbd3fe3a91d
- [v2,bpf-next,4/4] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_ksym_exists().
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/95fdf6e313a9
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists