netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] wifi: ath9k: avoid referencing uninit memory in ath9k_wmi_ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871qlovtho.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 07:26:11 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>
Cc:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Senthil Balasubramanian <senthilkumar@...eros.com>,
        "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
        Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanth@...eros.com>,
        Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@...eros.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
        lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
        syzbot+f2cb6e0ffdb961921e4d@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] wifi: ath9k: avoid referencing uninit memory in ath9k_wmi_ctrl_rx

Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru> writes:

> For the reasons described in commit b383e8abed41 ("wifi: ath9k: avoid
> uninit memory read in ath9k_htc_rx_msg()"), ath9k_htc_rx_msg() should
> validate pkt_len before accessing the SKB. For example, the obtained SKB
> may have uninitialized memory in the case of
> ioctl(USB_RAW_IOCTL_EP_WRITE).
>
> Implement sanity checking inside the corresponding endpoint RX handlers:
> ath9k_wmi_ctrl_rx() and ath9k_htc_rxep(). Otherwise, uninit memory can
> be referenced.
>
> Add comments briefly describing the issue.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

It would be also nice to know how you have tested these. Syzkaller is no
substitute for testing on a real hardware.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches