lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230317081513.ktllct3rqaisummm@soft-dev3-1>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:15:13 +0100
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     Kang Chen <void0red@...il.com>
CC:     <borisp@...dia.com>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/tls: refine the branch condition in tls_dev_event

The 03/17/2023 15:16, Kang Chen wrote:

Hi,

> 
> dev->tlsdev_ops may be null and cause null pointer dereference later.

In the subject of your patch, you should specify which tree is this
patch targeting. When you create the patch you can use:
git format-patch ... --subject-prefix "PATCH net" ...

> 
> Fixes: eeb2efaf36c7 ("net/tls: generalize the resync callback")
> Signed-off-by: Kang Chen <void0red@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/tls/tls_device.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> index a7cc4f9faac2..f30a8fe373c2 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> @@ -1449,7 +1449,8 @@ static int tls_dev_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,
>                 if (netif_is_bond_master(dev))
>                         return NOTIFY_DONE;
>                 if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX) &&
> -                   !dev->tlsdev_ops->tls_dev_resync)
> +                  (!dev->tlsdev_ops || (dev->tlsdev_ops &&
> +                   !dev->tlsdev_ops->tls_dev_resync)))

This can be simply written like:
(!dev->tlvdev_ops || !dev->tlvdev_ops->tls_dev_resync)

On the second condition you know already that dev->tlvdev_ops is not
NULL.

>                         return NOTIFY_BAD;
> 
>                 if  (dev->tlsdev_ops &&
> --
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
/Horatiu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ