netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mask apparently non-existing phys during probing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 19 Mar 2023 15:34:07 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Marek Behún <marek.behun@....cz>
Cc:     Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mask apparently
 non-existing phys during probing

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:06:06AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> > +	bus->phy_mask = GENMASK(31, mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip));
> 
> shouldnt this be
>   GENMASK(31, mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip) + chip->info->phy_base_addr) |
>   GENMASK(chip->info->phy_base_addr, 0)
> ?
> Or alternatively
>   ~GENMASK(chip->info->phy_base_addr + mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip),
>            chip->info->phy_base_addr)

Good point. Would you mind sending a patch? I prefer the second variant BTW.