[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230320135814.jncpvznka56liu36@sgarzare-redhat>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:58:14 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1] virtio/vsock: check transport before skb
allocation
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 01:37:10PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>Pointer to transport could be checked before allocation of skbuff, thus
>there is no need to free skbuff when this pointer is NULL.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
LGTM, I think net-next is fine for this.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index cda587196475..607149259e8b 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -867,6 +867,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t,
> if (le16_to_cpu(hdr->op) == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST)
> return 0;
>
>+ if (!t)
>+ return -ENOTCONN;
>+
> reply = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(&info, 0,
> le64_to_cpu(hdr->dst_cid),
> le32_to_cpu(hdr->dst_port),
>@@ -875,11 +878,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t,
> if (!reply)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
>- if (!t) {
>- kfree_skb(reply);
>- return -ENOTCONN;
>- }
>-
> return t->send_pkt(reply);
> }
>
>--
>2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists