lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 09:24:46 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/9] phy: phy-ocelot-serdes: add ability to
 be used in a non-syscon configuration

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 02:19:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 17-03-23, 11:54, Colin Foster wrote:
> > The phy-ocelot-serdes module has exclusively been used in a syscon setup,
> > from an internal CPU. The addition of external control of ocelot switches
> > via an existing MFD implementation means that syscon is no longer the only
> > interface that phy-ocelot-serdes will see.
> > 
> > In the MFD configuration, an IORESOURCE_REG resource will exist for the
> > device. Utilize this resource to be able to function in both syscon and
> > non-syscon configurations.
> 
> Applied to phy/next, thanks

Please read the netdev FAQ. Patches sent to netdev contain the tree that
the submitter wishes the patches to be applied to.

As a result, I see davem has just picked up the *entire* series which
means that all patches are in net-next now. net-next is immutable.

In any case, IMHO if this kind of fly-by cherry-picking from patch
series is intended, it should be mentioned during review to give a
chance for other maintainers to respond and give feedback. Not all
submitters will know how individual maintainers work. Not all
maintainers know how other maintainers work.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ