lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL+tcoB=xH374+KeV3SvqRh+Xi=ZvbLkmGx_wsmNcV_m0e4wsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:49:49 +0800
From:   Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     jbrouer@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, simon.horman@...igine.com,
        sinquersw@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 1/2] net-sysfs: display two backlog queue len separately

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 2:40 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 11:05:57 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > > Sometimes we need to know which one of backlog queue can be exactly
> > > long enough to cause some latency when debugging this part is needed.
> > > Thus, we can then separate the display of both.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> >
> > I just noticed that the state of this patch is "Changes Requested" in
> > the patchwork[1]. But I didn't see any feedback on this. Please let me
> > know if someone is available and provide more suggestions which are
> > appreciated.
> >
> > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230315092041.35482-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
>
> We work at a patch set granualrity, not at individual patches,
> so if there is feedback for any of the patches you need to repost.
> Even if it's just to drop the other patch from the series.

Well, I see. I'll drop the 2/2 patch and resend this one.

Thanks,
Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ