[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5655574a-71b5-79df-890e-81f3bd5e1cc2@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:29:04 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexandr.lobakin@...el.com, larysa.zaremba@...el.com,
xdp-hints@...-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
yoong.siang.song@...el.com, boon.leong.ong@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V1 3/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata track more
timestamps
On 17/03/2023 22.09, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> index 4c55b4d79d3d..f2a3b70a9882 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
>> @@ -69,9 +69,11 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>> return XDP_PASS;
>> }
>
>> - if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx, &meta->rx_timestamp))
>> - bpf_printk("populated rx_timestamp with %llu", meta->rx_timestamp);
>> - else
>> + if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx, &meta->rx_timestamp)) {
>> + meta->xdp_timestamp = bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns();
>> + bpf_printk("populated rx_timestamp with %llu", meta->rx_timestamp);
>> + bpf_printk("populated xdp_timestamp with %llu", meta->xdp_timestamp);
>> + } else
>> meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
>
> Nit: curly braces around else {} block as well?
Good point, fixed in V2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists