[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBvm24VJS4RMNUjHi24LqpYJnOYs_Md-J3FCEvp2vm7rcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:45:35 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
martin.lau@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
alexandr.lobakin@...el.com, larysa.zaremba@...el.com,
xdp-hints@...-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
yoong.siang.song@...el.com, boon.leong.ong@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V1 4/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata RX hash
return code info
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 6:32 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<jbrouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/03/2023 22.13, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 03/17, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >> When driver developers add XDP-hints kfuncs for RX hash it is
> >> practical to print the return code in bpf_printk trace pipe log.
> >
> >> Print hash value as a hex value, both AF_XDP userspace and bpf_prog,
> >> as this makes it easier to spot poor quality hashes.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> >
> > (with a small suggestion below, maybe can do separately?)
> >
> >> ---
> >> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 9 ++++++---
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 5 ++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> [...]
> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> index 400bfe19abfe..f3ec07ccdc95 100644
> >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> >> @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
> >> /* Reference program for verifying XDP metadata on real HW.
> >> Functional test
> >> * only, doesn't test the performance.
> >> *
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >> + * BPF-prog bpf_printk info outout can be access via
> >> + * /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe
> >
> > Maybe we should just dump the contents of
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace for every poll cycle?
> >
>
> I think this belongs to a separate patch.
SG. If you prefer to keep the comment let's also s/outout/outPut/.
> > We can also maybe enable tracing in this program transparently?
> > I usually forget 'echo 1 >
> > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk/enable'
> > myself :-)
> >
> What is this trick?
On the recent kernels I think this event has to be explicitly enabled
for bpf_prink() to work? Not sure.
That's why having something like enable_tracing() and dump_trace()
here might be helpful for whoever is running the prog.
> --Jesper
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists