[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230322112349.0e834126@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:23:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
Cc: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tianhao Zhao <tizhao@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Cooper <jonathan.s.cooper@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sfc: ef10: don't overwrite offload features at NIC
reset
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 07:47:42 +0100 Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> > Could you clarify what checks were removed? All I can see is the
> > 'NETIF_F_TSO6 requires NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM' check, and Siena already
> > supported NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM (it's only Falcon that didn't).
> > Or are you also referring to some items moving from efx.c to the
> > definition of EF10_OFFLOAD_FEATURES? That's fine and matches more
> > closely to what we do for ef100, but again the commit message could
> > explain this better.
> > In any case this should really be two separate patches, with the
> > cleanup part going to net-next.
> > That said, the above is all nit-picky, and the fix looks good, so:
> > Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>
> Hi. Kindly asking about the state of this patch, it is acked since 2
> weeks ago and it appears in patchwork as "changes requested". Is there
> something else I need to do? Thanks!
The commit message needs to be beefed up to answer all questions Ed had.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists