[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBtmpr_44kq9dOr4Kdz8t9xNFp4ow6J0_6EEyJhNgA=sTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:00:40 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
xdp-hints@...-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
"Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>,
"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V3 3/6] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata RX hash
return code info
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:09 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:01 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > When driver developers add XDP-hints kfuncs for RX hash it is
> > practical to print the return code in bpf_printk trace pipe log.
> >
> > Print hash value as a hex value, both AF_XDP userspace and bpf_prog,
> > as this makes it easier to spot poor quality hashes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 9 ++++++---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> > index 40c17adbf483..ce07010e4d48 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> > @@ -77,10 +77,13 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
> > meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
> > }
> >
> > - if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash))
> > - bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with %u", meta->rx_hash);
> > - else
> > + ret = bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash);
> > + if (ret >= 0) {
> > + bpf_printk("populated rx_hash with 0x%08X", meta->rx_hash);
> > + } else {
> > + bpf_printk("rx_hash not-avail errno:%d", ret);
> > meta->rx_hash = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */
> > + }
>
> Just noticed this mess of printks.
> Please remove them all. selftests should not have them.
See my reply in the v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists