[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230321203836.5ab4951e@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:38:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/14] lib: cpu_rmap: Avoid use after free on
rmap->obj array entries
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:51:31 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
>
> When calling irq_set_affinity_notifier() with NULL at the notify
> argument, it will cause freeing of the glue pointer in the
> corresponding array entry but will leave the pointer in the array. A
> subsequent call to free_irq_cpu_rmap() will try to free this entry again
> leading to possible use after free.
>
> Fix that by setting NULL to the array entry and checking that we have
> non-zero at the array entry when iterating over the array in
> free_irq_cpu_rmap().
Commit message needs some work. Are you trying to make double
free_irq_cpu_rmap() work fine because of callers? Are there problems
with error path of irq_cpu_rmap_add()? I can tell what you're trying
to prevent but not why.
> Fixes: c39649c331c7 ("lib: cpu_rmap: CPU affinity reverse-mapping")
What is this Fixes tag doing in a net-next patch :S
If it can be triggered it needs to go to net.
> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
> ---
> lib/cpu_rmap.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/cpu_rmap.c b/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> index f08d9c56f712..e77f12bb3c77 100644
> --- a/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> +++ b/lib/cpu_rmap.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,8 @@ void free_irq_cpu_rmap(struct cpu_rmap *rmap)
>
> for (index = 0; index < rmap->used; index++) {
After looking at this code for 10min - isn't the problem that used
is never decremented on the error path?
I don't see a way to remove from the map so it can't be sparse.
> glue = rmap->obj[index];
> - irq_set_affinity_notifier(glue->notify.irq, NULL);
> + if (glue)
> + irq_set_affinity_notifier(glue->notify.irq, NULL);
> }
>
> cpu_rmap_put(rmap);
> @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ static void irq_cpu_rmap_release(struct kref *ref)
> container_of(ref, struct irq_glue, notify.kref);
>
> cpu_rmap_put(glue->rmap);
> + glue->rmap->obj[glue->index] = NULL;
> kfree(glue);
> }
>
> @@ -297,6 +299,7 @@ int irq_cpu_rmap_add(struct cpu_rmap *rmap, int irq)
> rc = irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq, &glue->notify);
> if (rc) {
> cpu_rmap_put(glue->rmap);
> + rmap->obj[glue->index] = NULL;
> kfree(glue);
> }
> return rc;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists