[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230321205934.1c787208@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:59:34 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] virtio_net: refactor xdp codes
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:53:52 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Would it make sense to merge this one through the virtio tree?
> >
> > There are some small problems that we merge this patch-set to Virtio Tree
> > directly.
>
> what exactly? is there a dependency on net-next?
XDP is very actively developed, this seems like a bad idea :(
Is there a problem? Is it because the RFC was not getting much
attention? RFCs are for interesting code, really, nobody was
interested 🤷️ When it comes to merging - it will be in the tree
in two days if nobody finds bugs...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists