netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] octeon_ep: support asynchronous notifications

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230323103900.GC36557@unreal>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:39:00 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aayarekar@...vell.com, sedara@...vell.com, sburla@...vell.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 6/8] octeon_ep: support asynchronous
 notifications

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 02:19:55AM -0700, Veerasenareddy Burru wrote:
> Add asynchronous notification support to the control mailbox.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Abhijit Ayarekar <aayarekar@...vell.com>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
>  * 0005-xxx.patch in v3 is 0006-xxx.patch in v4.
>  * addressed review comments
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y+0J94sowllCe5Gs@boxer/
>    - fixed rct violation.
>    - process_mbox_notify() now returns void.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>  * no change
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>  * no change
> 
>  .../marvell/octeon_ep/octep_ctrl_net.c        | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_ctrl_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_ctrl_net.c
> index cef4bc3b1ec0..465eef2824e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_ctrl_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_ctrl_net.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,33 @@ static void process_mbox_resp(struct octep_device *oct,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int process_mbox_notify(struct octep_device *oct,
> +			       struct octep_ctrl_mbox_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *netdev = oct->netdev;
> +	struct octep_ctrl_net_f2h_req *req;
> +
> +	req = (struct octep_ctrl_net_f2h_req *)msg->sg_list[0].msg;
> +	switch (req->hdr.s.cmd) {
> +	case OCTEP_CTRL_NET_F2H_CMD_LINK_STATUS:
> +		if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> +			if (req->link.state) {
> +				dev_info(&oct->pdev->dev, "netif_carrier_on\n");
> +				netif_carrier_on(netdev);
> +			} else {
> +				dev_info(&oct->pdev->dev, "netif_carrier_off\n");
> +				netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> +			}

Shouldn't netdev changes be protected by some lock?
Is is safe to get event from FW and process it as is?

Thanks