netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: provide macros for commonly copied lockless queue stop/wake code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230323154614.6c24afca@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:46:14 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: provide macros for commonly copied
 lockless queue stop/wake code

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:02:29 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> We do seem to have a policy of asking for a 0/X. And it is used for
> the merge commit. That is my real point. And i don't see why the text
> can be repeated in the merge commit and the individual commits.

Alright, I'll respin and add a cover. But I think we should be critical
of the rules. The rules are just a mental shortcut, we shouldn't lose
sight of why they are in place and maintain some flexibility.