[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323073655.mppg4ty6qcqcpdmp@soft-dev3-1>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:36:55 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Liang He <windhl@....com>
CC: <andrew@...n.ch>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio: thunder: Add missing fwnode_handle_put()
The 03/23/2023 09:53, Liang He wrote:
>
> At 2023-03-22 16:55:38, "Horatiu Vultur" <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >The 03/22/2023 14:20, Liang He wrote:
> >>
> >> In device_for_each_child_node(), we should add fwnode_handle_put()
> >> when break out of the iteration device_for_each_child_node()
> >> as it will automatically increase and decrease the refcounter.
> >
> >Don't forget to mention the tree which you are targeting.
> >It shoud be something like:
> >"[PATCH net] net: mdio: thunder: Add missing fwnode_handle_put()" and
> >you can achieve this using option --subject-prefix when you create your
> >patch:
> >git format-patch ... --subject-prefix "PATCH net"
> >
>
> Thanks for your reply and advise, I will add it in my future patches.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Fixes: 379d7ac7ca31 ("phy: mdio-thunder: Add driver for Cavium Thunder SoC MDIO buses.")
> >> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@....com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/mdio/mdio-thunder.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-thunder.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-thunder.c
> >> index 822d2cdd2f35..394b864aaa37 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-thunder.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-thunder.c
> >> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ static int thunder_mdiobus_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >> if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(nexus->buses))
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> + fwnode_handle_put(fwn);
> >
> >Can you declare only 1 mdio bus in the DT under this pci device?
> >Because in that case, I don't think this is correct, because then
> >'device_for_each_child_node' will exit before all 4 mdio buses are probed.
> >And according to the comments for 'fwnode_handle_put' you need to use
> >with break or return.
> >
>
> In fact, the fwnode_handle_put(fwn) consider the NULL-check of fwn, and
> there are only break, not return, so I think it can work in this case.
> However, if you prefer to add fwnode_handle_put before break, I can
> send a new patch.
You are right, fwnode_handle_put checks for NULL.
It is up too you how you prefer.
>
> Thanks,
> Liang
>
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> err_release_regions:
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >
> >--
> >/Horatiu
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists