[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323194235.66fbd368@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:42:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, corbet@....net,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, mkl@...gutronix.de,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
romieu@...zoreil.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] docs: networking: document NAPI
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:39:59 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> > +It is recommended to pin each kernel thread to a single CPU, the same
> > +CPU as services the interrupt. Note that the mapping between IRQs and
>
> "... the same CPU as services the interrupt ...", should it be
> "the same CPU that services the interrupt" ?
"the same as" is a very common idiom.
There's a slight ellipsis there, perhaps, the full sentence is:
| It is recommended to pin each kernel thread to a single CPU, the same
| CPU as [the CPU which] services the interrupt.
Let me add the missing part.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists