[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJLdce57j6fPbLpexp=tzTtw9yDwV7wjT5FbNF6fPkk+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2023 10:35:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fix raising a softirq on the current cpu with
rps enabled
>
> Forgive me. Really I need some coffee. I made a mistake. This line
> above should be:
>
> + if (!test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &mysd->backlog.state))
>
> But the whole thing doesn't feel right. I need a few days to dig into
> this part until Eric can help me with more of it.
>
I am still traveling, and this is weekend time :/
It should not be too hard to read net/core/dev.c and remember that not
_all_ drivers (or some core networking functions) use the NAPI model.
eg look at netif_rx() and ask yourself why your patch is buggy.
Just look at callers of enqueue_to_backlog() and ask yourself if all
of them are called from net_rx_action()
[The answer is no, just in case you wonder]
In order to add your optimization, more work is needed, like adding
new parameters so that we do not miss critical
__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ) when _needed_.
We keep going circles around softirq deficiencies, I feel you are
trying to fix a second-order 'issue'.
Real cause is elsewhere, look at recent patches from Jakub.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists