netdev - [PATCH bpf v2 04/12] bpf: sockmap, handle fin correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230327175446.98151-5-john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:54:38 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     cong.wang@...edance.com, jakub@...udflare.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, lmb@...valent.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:     john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
        will@...valent.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 04/12] bpf: sockmap, handle fin correctly

The sockmap code is returning EAGAIN after a FIN packet is received and no
more data is on the receive queue. Correct behavior is to return 0 to the
user and the user can then close the socket. The EAGAIN causes many apps
to retry which masks the problem. Eventually the socket is evicted from
the sockmap because its released from sockmap sock free handling. The
issue creates a delay and can cause some errors on application side.

To fix this check on sk_msg_recvmsg side if length is zero and FIN flag
is set then set return to zero. A selftest will be added to check this
condition.

Fixes: 04919bed948dc ("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()")
Tested-by: William Findlay <will@...valent.com>
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index cf26d65ca389..3a0f43f3afd8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -174,6 +174,24 @@ static int tcp_msg_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static bool is_next_msg_fin(struct sk_psock *psock)
+{
+	struct scatterlist *sge;
+	struct sk_msg *msg_rx;
+	int i;
+
+	msg_rx = sk_psock_peek_msg(psock);
+	i = msg_rx->sg.start;
+	sge = sk_msg_elem(msg_rx, i);
+	if (!sge->length) {
+		struct sk_buff *skb = msg_rx->skb;
+
+		if (skb && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN)
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
 				  struct msghdr *msg,
 				  size_t len,
@@ -193,6 +211,19 @@ static int tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(struct sock *sk,
 	lock_sock(sk);
 msg_bytes_ready:
 	copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags);
+	/* The typical case for EFAULT is the socket was gracefully
+	 * shutdown with a FIN pkt. So check here the other case is
+	 * some error on copy_page_to_iter which would be unexpected.
+	 * On fin return correct return code to zero.
+	 */
+	if (copied == -EFAULT) {
+		bool is_fin = is_next_msg_fin(psock);
+
+		if (is_fin) {
+			copied = 0;
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
 	if (!copied) {
 		long timeo;
 		int data;
-- 
2.33.0