[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6421ddc9f15b8_18d4f208ec@john.notmuch>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 11:17:45 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, cong.wang@...edance.com,
jakub@...udflare.com, daniel@...earbox.net, lmb@...valent.com,
edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: john.fastabend@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
will@...valent.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf v2 00/11] bpf sockmap fixes
John Fastabend wrote:
> Fixes for sockmap running against NGINX TCP tests and also on an
> underprovisioned VM so that we hit error (ENOMEM) cases regularly.
>
> The first 3 patches fix cases related to ENOMEM that were either
> causing splats or data hangs.
>
> Then 4-7 resolved cases found when running NGINX with its sockets
> assigned to sockmap. These mostly have to do with handling fin/shutdown
> incorrectly and ensuring epoll_wait works as expected.
>
> Patches 8 and 9 extract some of the logic used for sockmap_listen tests
> so that we can use it in other tests because it didn't make much
> sense to me to add tests to the sockmap_listen cases when here we
> are testing send/recv *basic* cases.
>
> Finally patches 10 and 11 add the new tests to ensure we handle
> ioctl(FIONREAD) and shutdown correctly.
>
> To test the series I ran the NGINX compliance tests and the sockmap
> selftests. For now our compliance test just runs with SK_PASS.
>
> There are some more things to be done here, but these 11 patches
> stand on their own in my opionion and fix issues we are having in
> CI now. For bpf-next we can fixup/improve selftests to use the
> ASSERT_* in sockmap_helpers, streamline some of the testing, and
> add more tests. We also still are debugging a few additional flakes
> patches coming soon.
>
> v2: use skb_queue_empty instead of *_empty_lockless (Eric)
> oops incorrectly updated copied_seq on DROP case (Eric)
> added test for drop case copied_seq update
>
Sorry folks on the to line there I resent with the cc list here. I had
suppressed the CC list in the first batch.
.John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists