[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30ae760b-b7c4-4756-bfde-27b43c64b28a@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:13:14 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT 05/23] net: phy: Immediately call adjust_link if only
tx_lpi_enabled changes
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:02:01PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:01:43PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > The MAC driver changes its EEE hardware configuration in its
> > adjust_link callback. This is called when auto-neg completes. If
> > set_eee is called with a change to tx_lpi_enabled which does not
> > trigger an auto-neg, it is necessary to call the adjust_link callback
> > so that the MAC is reconfigured to take this change into account.
> >
> > When setting phydev->eee_active, take tx_lpi_enabled into account, so
> > the MAC drivers don't need to consider tx_lpi_enabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> Hmm..
>
> > @@ -1619,11 +1619,20 @@ int phy_ethtool_set_eee(struct phy_device *phydev, struct ethtool_eee *data)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
> > ret = genphy_c45_ethtool_set_eee(phydev, data);
> > - if (!ret)
> > + if (ret >= 0) {
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + /* auto-neg not triggered */
> > + if (phydev->tx_lpi_enabled != data->tx_lpi_enabled) {
> > + phydev->tx_lpi_enabled = data->tx_lpi_enabled;
> > + if (phydev->link)
> > + phy_link_up(phydev);
> > + }
> > + }
> > phydev->tx_lpi_enabled = data->tx_lpi_enabled;
>
> So we set eee_active depending on tx_lpi_enabled:
>
> > + phydev->eee_active = (err & phydev->tx_lpi_enabled);
>
> However, if tx_lpi_enabled changes state in this function, we don't
> update phydev->eee_active, but it's phydev->eee_active that gets
> passed back to MAC drivers. Is that intentional?
No, that is a bug. I don't think phy_check_link_status() can be called
here, since we might not be in state RUNNING. So a bit of refactoring
is required to add a function which can update phydev->eee_active.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists