[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCFYSpw5mOj2pJIB@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 10:48:10 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
Cc: edward.cree@....com, linux-net-drivers@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] sfc: add functions to insert encap
matches into the MAE
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 09:28:57AM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 25/03/2023 12:04, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 08:45:12PM +0000, edward.cree@....com wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
> >> index c1485679507c..19782c9a4354 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
> >> @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct efx_tc_encap_match {
> >> __be32 src_ip, dst_ip;
> >> struct in6_addr src_ip6, dst_ip6;
> >> __be16 udp_dport;
> >> + u16 tun_type; /* enum efx_encap_type */
> >
> > nit: maybe the type of tyn_type can be enum efx_encap_type.
>
> Yeah, it probably should. Looking at my git history I think the
> initial reason was for struct-packing reasons (enums are int-sized
> at minimum, which is excessive for a field whose largest value is
> 3), but with the rhash_head that later appears between these two
> fields, using the narrower type doesn't actually avoid a 16-bit
> hole like it appears to here.
> Will change in v3.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists