netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] virtio/vsock: WARN_ONCE() for invalid state of socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:29:12 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] virtio/vsock: WARN_ONCE() for invalid state
 of socket

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:09:25AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This adds WARN_ONCE() and return from stream dequeue callback when
>socket's queue is empty, but 'rx_bytes' still non-zero.

Nit: I would explain why we add this, for example:

This allows the detection of potential bugs due to packet merging
(see previous patch).

>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index b9144af71553..ad70531de133 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -398,6 +398,13 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	u32 free_space;
>
> 	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+
>+	if (WARN_ONCE(skb_queue_empty(&vvs->rx_queue) && vvs->rx_bytes,
>+		      "No skbuffs with non-zero 'rx_bytes'\n")) {

Nit: I would rephrase it this way:
"rx_queue is empty, but rx_bytes is non-zero"

>+		spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>+		return err;
>+	}
>+
> 	while (total < len && !skb_queue_empty(&vvs->rx_queue)) {
> 		skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
>
>-- 
>2.25.1
>

Anyway the patch LGTM!

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>