lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <itjmw7vh3a7ggbodsu4mksu2hqbpdpxmu6cpexbra66nfhsw4x@hzpuzwldkfx5> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 11:39:35 +0200 From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport >was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as: >commit >c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"), >but for receive calls. > >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c >@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, > > read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags); In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors. Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if those functions fail to keep the same behavior. CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@...are.com The other transports seem okay to me. Thanks, Stefano > if (read < 0) { >- err = -ENOMEM; >+ err = read; > break; > } > >@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, > msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags); > > if (msg_len < 0) { >- err = -ENOMEM; >+ err = msg_len; > goto out; > } > >-- >2.25.1 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists