lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZCNQ0YqLR3OxMgd3@salvia> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 22:40:49 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> To: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com> Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 1/1] netfilter: ctnetlink: Support offloaded conntrack entry deletion Hi Paul, Apologies for lagging to catch up with this. On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:35:32AM +0200, Paul Blakey wrote: > Currently, offloaded conntrack entries (flows) can only be deleted > after they are removed from offload, which is either by timeout, > tcp state change or tc ct rule deletion. This can cause issues for > users wishing to manually delete or flush existing entries. > > Support deletion of offloaded conntrack entries. > > Example usage: > # Delete all offloaded (and non offloaded) conntrack entries > # whose source address is 1.2.3.4 > $ conntrack -D -s 1.2.3.4 > # Delete all entries > $ conntrack -F This fine with me. I think probably it much be documented somewhere that in case of hardware offload, deletion is asynchronous.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists