lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19c7497a-d98f-d46f-2912-8ff69276d7d6@starfivetech.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:28:47 +0800
From:   Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>,
        Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac


Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] dt-bindings: net: Add support StarFive dwmac
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
to: Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
data: 2023/3/28

> On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 09:53:22 +0800 Guo Samin wrote:
>> Thanks,  I will resent with [PATCH net-next v9].
>> My series of patches will depend on Hal's minimal system[1] and william's syscon patch[2], and this context comes from their patch.
>>
>> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20230320103750.60295-1-hal.feng@starfivetech.com
>> [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20230315055813.94740-1-william.qiu@starfivetech.com
>>
>> Do I need to remove their context?
> 
> If the conflict is just on MAINTAINERS it should be safe to ignore.
> Resend your patches on top of net-next as if their patches didn't
> exist. Stephen/Linus will have not trouble resolving the conflict.

I see, I'll send net-next as you suggest.

Best regards,
Samin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ