[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518631.1680100773@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:39:33 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
dccp@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 48/48] sock: Remove ->sendpage*() in favour of sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES)
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de> wrote:
> > [!] Note: This is a work in progress. At the moment, some things won't
> > build if this patch is applied. nvme, kcm, smc, tls.
Actually, that needs updating. nvme and smc now build.
> Weelll ... what happens to consumers of kernel_sendpage()?
> (Let's call them nvme ...)
> Should they be moved over, too?
Patch 42 should address NVMe, I think. I can't test it, though, as I don't
have hardware.
There should be no callers of kernel_sendmsg() by the end of this patchset,
and the only remaining implementors of sendpage are Chelsio-TLS, AF_TLS and
AF_KCM, which as stated in the cover, aren't yet converted and won't build.
> Or what is the general consensus here?
>
> (And what do we do with TLS? It does have a ->sendpage() version, too ...)
I know. There are three things left that I need to tackle, but I'd like to
get opinions on some of the other bits and I might need some help with AF_TLS
and AF_KCM.
That said, should I just remove tls_sw_do_sendpage() since presumably the data
is going to get copied(?) and encrypted and the source pages aren't going to
be held onto?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists