netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 03/15] net: dsa: mt7530: use regmap to access switch register space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZCSEbUt9kj8Ta6Yc@makrotopia.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:33:17 +0100
From:   Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Sam Shih <Sam.Shih@...iatek.com>,
        Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 03/15] net: dsa: mt7530: use regmap to
 access switch register space

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 06:24:21PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Thanks for splitting this patchset up. This is much easier to review.
> 
> > +static u32
> > +mt7530_mii_read(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	u32 val;
> > +
> > +	ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, reg, &val);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(priv->dev,
> > +			"failed to read mt7530 register\n");
> > +		return ret;
> 
> This is a u32 function. ret should be negative on error, which is
> going to be turned positive in order to return a u32. So you probably
> want to make this an int function.

This is a pre-existing flaw in the code. As we are accessing 32-bit
registers there has just never been any meaningful error handling.
I guess the correct solution would be to not use the return value only
to indicate success or error, and use an additional u32* parameter for
the read value.

However, I was hestitating to convert all the calls (they are many) to
follow that improved paradigm.

Should I?