[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <343825bad568ec0a21c283f876585585b040da9f.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:48:22 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] virtio_net: introduce receive_small_xdp()
On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 20:04 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> @@ -949,15 +1042,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> {
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> - unsigned int xdp_headroom = (unsigned long)ctx;
> - unsigned int header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
> + unsigned int header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD;
> unsigned int headroom = vi->hdr_len + header_offset;
This changes (reduces) the headroom for non-xpd-pass skbs.
[...]
> + buf += header_offset;
> + memcpy(skb_vnet_hdr(skb), buf, vi->hdr_len);
AFAICS, that also means that receive_small(), for such packets, will
look for the virtio header in a different location. Is that expected?
Thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists