[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230329200403.095be0f7@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:04:03 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: rps/rfs improvements
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 23:50:17 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Overall, in an intensive RPC workload, with 32 TX/RX queues with RFS
> I was able to observe a ~10% reduction of NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
> invocations.
small clarification on the testing:
invocations == calls to net_rx_action()
or
invocations == calls to __raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ)
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists