[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCWXZF3rOucT1M7c@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:06:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, rafael@...nel.org,
Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] regmap: check for alignment on translated register
addresses
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:45:46AM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > It is not at all clear to me that the combination of stride and
> > downshift particularly makes sense, and especially not that the
> > stride should be applied after downshifting rather than to what
> > the user is passing in.
> I agree on the part where the ordering of "adding and offset, then
> down/upshifting" isn't natural. This is the order in which operations
> are done today, and from what I could gather, only the ocelot-spi MFD
> driver uses both of these operations.
Right. I don't think the ordering is particularly intentional,
like I say it's not clear that combinding the two makes sense so
I think it just wasn't considered at all.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists