[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <838854.1680187186@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:39:46 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 16/48] ip, udp: Support MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>
> A non-RFC version would require the same for ipv6, of course.
I missed the fact that ipv6 had it's own version of __ip_append_data() despite
sharing tcp_sendmsg(). Could __ip_append_data() and __ip6_append_data() be
shared? I guess that the v6_cork, the flowi6 and the ipcm6_cookie might
prevent that.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists